 |
Who's Online |
 |
|
There are currently, 24 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.
You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here
|
|
|
 |
| |
 Baalbek: Stones the size of Buses moved by the Ancients?
Posted bybibleland on Sunday, December 12 @ 10:53:28 CST
Contributed by bibleland
What is Baalbek?
Baalbek is the name given to the stone ruins in Lebanon about 65 miles northeast of Beirut. These ruins are mysterious because some of the stones used in the base are enormous. Who moved them? And how? Do the many huge megaliths around the world indicate civilatations more advanced than previously thought or were they simply willing to spend the time necessary to chip stone this big and transport it?
We know from inscriptions in different parts of the ruins that the Romans built these incredibly ornate and beautiful temples in the first 300 years AD. The question is did they also build the enormous stone bases beneath?
“Professor Daniel Krenker of the German Mission of excavations as well as Professor Theodore Wignad believe that this great substructure was the beginning of a prodigiously great Temple, the construction of which was abandoned in order to build in its enclosure the present smaller Temple, the execution of which was much less costly.” (Alouf, History of Baalbek, 1999)
Others do not agree. Some people believe that Baalbek, at least the base, is much older than the Romans. It has been sometimes identified with Baalath and Baal-Gad; ancient biblical cities. Different eastern legends believe this is the most ancient building in the world – built by Cain – while others add that it is the location of the Tower of Babel built by Nimrod. The curator of Baalbek, during the years 1897 through 1934, Mihel M. Alouf said, “Although we find it impossible to identify Baalbek with Baal-Gad, we nevertheless have sufficient data to assert the importance and great antiquity of the former town. The huge blocks of the primeval constructions, without any architectural style and capable of defying the ravages of the centuries, carry us back to the remotest era of time. Such marvelous edifices undeniably teach us that, here, there lived a race of giants worshipping the Sun-god Baalbek…(Alouf, History of Baalbek, 1999)
It boils down to this.
There are stone megaliths all over the world. Many defy explanation either because of their sheer size or because of the precision with which they were dressed and laid. In the temple base at Baalbek, for example, most of the stones “range in size from thirty to thirty three feet in length, fourteen feet in height and ten feet in depth, and weigh approximately 450 tons each. Nine of these blocks are visible on the north side of the temple, nine on the south and six on the west (others may exist but archaeological excavations have thus far not dug beneath all the sections of the Grand Terrace)."(Alouf, History of Baalbek, 1999) These blocks, 450 tons each, are not even the biggest of the stones they moved.
How do we do it today?
Rock quarries of today use one of three methods to cut blocks that are normally 40 x 30 x 17 feet: a pneumatically powered drill (air powered), a diamond wire saw (which uses a diesel motor) or a water jet (which uses a diesel motor and a pneumatic drill). However, even a 40 x 8 x 6 ft. block would weigh more than 190 tons so they further cut them into 10 x 5 x 5 feet blocks (still more than 20 tons) before using steel derricks (stationary cranes) to lift them out. In the 1800s wooden derricks were used which could lift 40 tons. The steel derricks of today can lift between 100 and 250 tons but use electricity to power them.
What is the problem?
It is hard to imagine the amount of time needed to chip a block of stone a few feet in length much less blocks that weigh hundreds of tons each. Let’s say that somehow they do managed to cut these blocks, how then did they lift them into place? There is a very interesting article about Baalbek on www.sacredsites.com a portion of which is used here with permission.
“The great mystery of the ruins of Baalbek, and indeed one of the greatest mysteries of the ancient world, concerns the massive foundation stones beneath the Roman Temple of Jupiter. The courtyard of the Jupiter temple is situated upon a platform, called the Grand Terrace, that consists of a huge outer wall and a filling of massive stones. The lower courses of this great outer wall are formed of huge, finely crafted and precisely positioned blocks. Above the six blocks on the western side are three even larger stones, called the Trilithon, whose weight exceeds 1000 tons each. These great stones vary in size between sixty-three and sixty-five feet in length, with a height of fourteen feet six inches and a depth of twelve feet.”(www.sacredsites.com)
The most intriguing part of Baalbek is the block of limestone that was never used from a quarry one-quarter mile away. At sixty-nine feet by sixteen feet by thirteen feet ten inches, it was the largest of them all. I asked some crane operators what this block would weigh and could it be lifted with today’s cranes, This is the answer I got from J.D. Mitchell, P.E., Crane and Hoist Engineering (Gresham, Oregon):
“I can calculate the weight of the limestone block for you. According to my engineering handbook, limestone weighs between 130 and 180 pounds per cubic foot. A block 69' X 16' X 13'-10" would have a volume of 15,272 cubic feet. At 130#/CF the block would weigh 1,985,360 pounds or 902 tonnes (992 tons). At 180#/CF it would weigh 2,748,960 pounds or 1,250 tonnes (1374 tons).”
Bruce Stemp from Lampson Intl. told me, “It would take a crane of similar size to this to place the large stones you are talking about. This is a Lampson LTL-1500 Transi-Lift and is capable of lifting 1500 tons. The lift radius and other factors reduce this capacity so to place the stones at height and distance requires a crane with higher ultimate capacity.”
Two more points made in the sacredsites’ web article that were particularly interesting concern the method of transportation and a comparison given as an example of lifting capacity during the Renaissance:
“Why these stones are such an enigma to contemporary scientists, both engineers and archaeologists alike, is that their method of quarrying, transportation and precision placement is beyond the technological ability of any ancient or modern builders. Various ‘scholars’, uncomfortable with the notion that ancient cultures might have developed knowledge superior to modern science, have decided that the great Baalbek stones were laboriously dragged from the nearby quarries to the temple site. While carved images in the temples of Egypt and Mesopotamia do indeed give evidence of this method of block transportation - using ropes, wooden rollers and thousands of laborers - the dragged blocks are known to have been only 1/10th the size and weight of the Baalbek stones and to have been moved along flat surfaces with wide movement paths. The route to the site of Baalbek, however, is up hill, over rough and winding terrain, and there is no evidence whatsoever of a flat hauling surface having been created in ancient times.”
“Next there is the problem of how the mammoth blocks, once they were brought to the site, were lifted and precisely placed in position. It has been theorized that the stones were raised using a complex array of scaffolding, ramps and pulleys that was powered by large numbers of humans and animals working in unison. An historical example of this method has been suggested as the solution for the Baalbek enigma. The Renaissance architect Domenico Fontana, when erecting a 327-ton Egyptian obelisk in front of St Peter's Basilica in Rome, used 40 huge pulleys, which necessitated a combined force of 800 men and 140 horses. The area where this obelisk was erected, however, was a great open space that could easily accommodate all the lifting apparatus and the men and horses pulling on the ropes. No such space is available in the spatial context of how the Baalbek stones were placed. Hills slope away from where lifting apparatus would need to have been placed and no evidence has been found of a flat and structurally firm surface having been constructed (and then mysteriously removed after the lifting was done). Furthermore, not just one obelisk was erected but rather a series of giant stones were precisely put in place side-by-side. Due to the positioning of these stones, there is simply no conceivable place where a huge pulley apparatus could have been stationed.”
In conclusion, there are basically 3 options we have to explain this puzzle. Either our ancestors possessed greater technology that previously thought, they were giants with exponential strength or they simply enjoyed spending centuries chipping and lugging around huge stone blocks. If you would like to learn more about ancient technology then click here.
|
|
| |
|
|
Article Rating |
|
|
Average Score: 4.2
Votes: 10
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Baalbek: Stones the size of Buses moved by the Ancients? (Score: 1)
by Cimber on Monday, December 13 @ 18:42:11 CST
(User Info | Send a Message) | | This makes me wonder if that's what Jesus meant when He said that the day of the Son of Man would be like the days of Noah. Perhaps we are only now catching up to what men could do before the flood. I also wonder if the myth of Atlantis is a perversion of what happened to the world when the judgment came--from humanity's side, that is. |
|
|
| |
|
|
Newsletter |
|
|
Subscribe to the Lost World Museum newsletter, which will notify you of the latest discoveries from around the world!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Help Find the Evidence |
|
|
Bibleland Studios needs your help in locating evidence that will prove the Biblical account of creation to be accurate.
We are providing a list of needed artifacts, YOU can help find them!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Old Articles |
|
|
| Wednesday, May 03 | | · | Instantaneous Creation |
| Friday, April 21 | | · | Adolfi and Lee Appear on International Television |
| Thursday, April 06 | | · | "Cy" the Cyclops Kitty Moves to Lost World Museum |
| Tuesday, March 28 | | · | New Ark Anomaly Gives Researchers Hope |
| Thursday, February 16 | | · | Announcing the opening of the Lost World Museum |
| Monday, February 06 | | · | Evolution: bogus science used to attack religion |
| Monday, January 30 | | · | Giant Sequoias: A Portal Into Our Ancient Past |
| Thursday, December 08 | | · | Is Noah's Ark in Iran? |
| Tuesday, November 29 | | · | Were Adam and Eve Giants? Revisited. |
| Monday, November 21 | | · | Announcing the Greatest Sale in the History of Bibleland |
| Thursday, November 17 | | · | Chariots of the gods. |
| Friday, November 11 | | · | The Unsung Heroes of the 21st Century |
| Friday, October 28 | | · | Evolution's Ugly Red-headed Stepchild |
| Monday, October 24 | | · | Giant Humbugs |
| Tuesday, October 18 | | · | Giant Fossil Could Be Mammoth Hoax |
| Friday, October 14 | | · | Dead Men Do Tell Tales |
| Monday, October 10 | | · | Drool Points To A Designer |
| Monday, October 03 | | · | The Most Incredible Birth Ever! |
| Thursday, September 29 | | · | Celebrating 18 months online! |
| Wednesday, September 21 | | · | The Strength of Giants |
| Sunday, September 04 | | · | Show and Tell |
| Thursday, August 04 | | · | The Gospel in Creation |
| Monday, June 27 | | · | Help find the Evidence |
| Friday, June 10 | | · | Why Mainstream Science Rejects Creation |
| Tuesday, May 31 | | · | Noah's Ark Expeditions 2005 June Update |
| Friday, May 06 | | · | Was Man Ever a Half Ape Looking Midget? |
| Wednesday, April 27 | | · | Noah’s Ark: Eyewitnesses & Expeditions |
| Tuesday, April 19 | | · | The Eye of The Storm |
| Thursday, April 14 | | · | The Wonder of Reality |
| Monday, March 28 | | · | Evolutionist Turncoat… A Freak of Science? |
Older Articles
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subscribe to our news feed.